Hi Viplove,
Still i m not getting any data. I have used both approach.
Odata service gives me data in success function module.
Thanks
Nishant
Hi Viplove,
Still i m not getting any data. I have used both approach.
Odata service gives me data in success function module.
Thanks
Nishant
Hi Faizan
There are few steps to check ur EVM :
1. Ensure default method or assigned method of each object
2. Maintain consistency for EV basis and data >> if you decide to use Annual Cost Plan in your EV version then make sure each object (WBS,Actvity) has annual cost plan value.
3. To ensure POC is calculated, check schedule within activity and related settings
3. Check all parameters through SE38 program CHECKREPORT_PROGRESSANALYSIS
4. Running CNE1
5. Show EV project with PS Profile SAPPS_EV0001
note :
+ EV Basis Budget only work in WBS
+ for Internal activity :
+ Plan method : Cost Proportion and Milestone
+ Actual method : Work and Milestone
Below is screenshot of my example
As you can see, there are several key elements shown :
- POC (both planned for BCWS and actual for BCWP)
- Planned Cost (as i use Annual Cost plan as basis)
salam hangat,
danniel
Hi Team ,
Any user exit to send the mail notification to user once payment is fully approved.
As per the standard SAP BCM workflow the mail notification is being triggered
to the initiator(Any other option to trigger the mail).
Regards
Dwity Krushna Panda
Dear All,
We are facing issue in travel management for below given standard scenarios.
We want to book travel cost/ expenses against WBS. Cost object will be a WBS. The respective WBS will have budget & plan values for the year of posting. We have not implemented fund management and would be unable to do so.
Now the issue is
Isn't budgeting, Commitment update and availability controls all standard scenarios in project system.
Shouldn't it also work for any expenses booking scenarios for travel management.
Please advise.
Regards,
Rijuraj
Hi, Vinita
Thanks your reply, but no service PR is right to create SRM local PO, just issue is for service PR to create PO
Jesse.
Hey Lutz
I'd just like to add the following as I accidentally omitted it from my first response.
In AFP, workcenter roles are displayed in Contextual Navigation Panel (CNP) view which have only two levels,
Could you kindly try the following: Go to Detailed Navigation iView. For property 'Navigation Panel Mode' Select 'Always Use Detailed Navigation iView' to display workcenter roles in the Detailed Navigation view.
With this enhancement workcenter roles should in theory be displayed with Detailed Navigation view.
Many thanks.
Kind Regards & Talk Soon
Troy Cronin - Enterprise Portal Support Engineer
Hi Kul,
I am not very familiar with the system. Still I tried to find out using BP transaction. I didn't find any duplicate entry in the below screenshot under the 'Partner' tab. Does that mean no duplicate mapping?
As for dump, I've to request that from my functional since issue is in production system and he's in a different time zone.
Thanks,
Sarif
Could someone point me in the direction of a user guide for SAP B1 9.0 distribution rules? I would like to know how to set them up, what the options are, what the results might be, how to run them etc. Regards Edward
Hi,
There is no way set for approval process for Production order, Receipt from production and Issue for production.
Thanks,
Harshal
Hi, Wendy
I think your advice is very useful , I will have a try to create a local service PO.
Thanks
Jesse.
Hi Chowdary
Transport group related to you have many clients in Each SID ( QAS , PRD )
Hi Pradeep,
Our UR team is always looking for web browser changes and testing with our software. The notes I pointed out in my first reply are updated when necessary.
Cheers,
Cris
OK thanks Kenny.
Yes, I see the same issue with "In Process" work modes.
However, if I delete the "In Process" work mode, then technical monitoring will stop.
This causes an additional headache for me as I've configured work modes for every part of the day.
E.g:
Non-business: 00:01 - 08:59
Normal business hours: 09:00 - 18:00
Non-business: 18:01 - 23:59
So, I've found that I can simply adjust the end-time of the "In Process" work mode, to create a gap (only needs 1 minute gap), into which I can then create a 1 minute downtime work mode, then "Add Phase" to the downtime work mode to extend it accordingly.
The additional phase extends over any other scheduled work modes (as you've found).
So I don't lose any monitoring in the time between the current "In Process" work mode and the start of the downtime work mode.
Darryl
I can only find the INCIDENT.DATE_LOGGED.
here is the query:
SELECT
INCIDENT_ID,
COUNT(ACT_TYPE_ID) - (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM act_reg a2 WHERE act_reg.incident_id = a2.incident_id AND act_type_id = 6) AS ZUWEISUNGEN
FROM
ACT_REG
WHERE
ACT_TYPE_ID = 1 AND
(ACT_REG.ASSYST_USR_ID != '473' or ACT_REG.ASSYST_USR_ID != '712' or ACT_REG.ASSYST_USR_ID != '323' or ACT_REG.ASSYST_USR_ID != '780') AND
ACT_REG.SERV_DEPT_ID = 28 AND
ACT_REG.***_SVD_ID <> 28 AND
INCIDENT_ID IN (
SELECT
INCIDENT.INCIDENT_ID
FROM
INCIDENT
LEFT OUTER JOIN INC_DATA ON
INCIDENT.INCIDENT_ID = INC_DATA.INCIDENT_ID
WHERE
INCIDENT.DATE_LOGGED BETWEEN add_months((last_day(SYSDATE))+1,-6) AND add_months((last_day(SYSDATE))+1,-1) AND
(CSG_ID = '1' OR CSG_ID = '7') AND
INC_DATA.EVENT_TYPE = 'i' AND
(INCIDENT.INC_STATUS = 'c' OR INCIDENT.INC_STATUS = 'p')
)
GROUP BY INCIDENT_ID
ORDER BY ZUWEISUNGEN ASC
So the query returns only two fields in CR, which are INCIDENT_ID and ZUWEISUNGEN.
Sorry for bothering you so much!!!
Hello Experts,
I have two queries related to Security:
1) I have a scenario where under SU53 screen shot, under S_Develop Auth Obj., I can find 5 fields as
(Missing Authorization)
ACTVT : 03
DEVCLASS: <Dummy>
OBJNAME: <Dummy>
OBJTYPE: DEBUG
P_GROUP:<Dummy>
When I checked the specific Authorization object under specific Role, I found entries as below:
ACTVT : 03
DEVCLASS: CRM*
OBJNAME: CRM*
OBJTYPE: WAPA
P_GROUP: *
Now, what are my options here to fix this issue. I need to *** DEBUG Object type, if I add I need to delete the existing one and if I just add without deleting the existing one, the ACTVT field will become same for Object type DEBUG and WAPA. What if I don't want to play with current OBJTYPE type and just add the OBJTYPE DEBUG and its ACTVT? Please suggest.
2) I see that there are roles which are only there in ECC system, not there in CRM. However when we are not able to use a specific transaction in CRM, we make those changes in ECC system. My concern here, if a role is functioning fine in ECC system but when trying the same thing from CRM system(User is there in both systems), it won't work. What could be cause?
Regards
Piyush
Hi Michael,
Please look at the thread below. The solution is provided there. You might need to implement 2 Notes. Let me know if the issue persists even after implementing the note.
Use BOPF with ABAP in Eclipse?
Thanks and Regards,
Shyam
Dear
Means Batch or stock already assigned with SO through 412 E.
Plz check through MB51.
Leandro, essa nota 1840188 é aplicavel no meu ambiente. Irei aplicar agora e lhe informo.